The Open Badge standard is out there and can be adopted by anyone. The standard (being a standard) is de-centralised. However, the tools that comply with the standard often aren’t. And why should they be? The norm in platforms is to create a sticky one. Get people in, and keep people in.

There’s a collective hunch amongst a bunch of people I know and like (a number were part of the Mozilla Open Badges team) that Blockchain technology (made famous by Bitcoin) could provide a decentralised architecture for Open Badges.

If none of that makes any sense to you, worry ye not. But if you’re interested in why de-centralising credentials might make a difference, the Starfish and the Spider might prove a prudent read…

Bryan Mathers

Share
Published by
Bryan Mathers
Tags: @badgechain

Recent Posts

The Meaning of Recognition

I think in the early days of thinking about open credentialing, I got fixated on…

5 days ago

How you made them feel

I was listening to a politics podcast at the beginning of last week (weren't we…

7 days ago

Microcredentials and Recognition

Hidden in conversation are a whole host of metaphors, which are pictorial clues to the…

2 weeks ago

Elements of a badging policy

What creates the spark behind an illustration? There's nothing I love better than playing idea…

2 weeks ago

The AI arms race

It seems that somebody somewhere is using new and sneaky ways of getting messages into…

3 months ago

Permission Slip

I was giving a public talk at a Life Sciences museum in Göttingen, Germany earlier…

4 months ago